• Home
  • About
    • Members
    • Associate Members
    • Former members
  • Thematic Areas
    • Containers
    • Cruise
    • European Port Policy
    • Ports & COVID-19
  • PortStudies
  • Presentations
  • Noticeboard
  • Viewpoints
  • PortLibrary
  • PortReport
PortEconomics
  • October 18th, 2025
PortEconomics
  • Home
  • About
    • Members
    • Associate Members
    • Former members
  • Thematic Areas
    • Containers
    • Cruise
    • European Port Policy
    • Ports & COVID-19
  • PortStudies
    Geopolitical risks and port-related carbon emissions: evidence and policy implications

    Geopolitical risks and port-related carbon emissions: evidence and policy implications

    Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

    Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

    Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents:  Kuwait Shuwaikh Port

    Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents: Kuwait Shuwaikh Port

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    Stakeholders’ attitudes toward container terminal automation

    Stakeholders’ attitudes toward container terminal automation

  • Presentations
    Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

    Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

    When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

    When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    The World Ports Tracker in TOC Europe

    The World Ports Tracker in TOC Europe

    Newly-upgraded IAPH World Ports Tracker identifies major sustainability and market trends

    Newly-upgraded IAPH World Ports Tracker identifies major sustainability and market trends

  • Noticeboard
    Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025

    Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025

    PhD posts in the area of ports and energy transition

    PhD posts in the area of ports and energy transition

    PortEconomics members among best-performing scholars globally

    PortEconomics members among best-performing scholars globally

    Accessibility or connectivity: why is it correct to say that in the Caribbean the main logistics problem is connectivity?

    Accessibility or connectivity: why is it correct to say that in the Caribbean the main logistics problem is connectivity?

    Cruise Port-City Compass

    Cruise Port-City Compass

  • Viewpoints
    Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025

    Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025

    Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

    Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

    In a tight spot: American ports in global supply chains

    In a tight spot: American ports in global supply chains

    Cruise industry in 2025 at a glance

    Cruise industry in 2025 at a glance

    The box that makes the world go around: container terminals and global trade

    The box that makes the world go around: container terminals and global trade

  • PortLibrary
  • PortReport
PortGraphic: towards a “Rotterdamisation” of the european container port system?Containers

PortGraphic: towards a “Rotterdamisation” of the european container port system?

February 18th, 2018 Containers, Featured, Viewpoints

fairplay.ihs.com

READ ALSO

Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025
Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025
Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines
Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines
Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents:  Kuwait Shuwaikh Port
Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents: Kuwait Shuwaikh Port
Geopolitical risks and port-related carbon emissions: evidence and policy implications
Geopolitical risks and port-related carbon emissions: evidence and policy implications

By Theo Notteboom

Last week, the Rotterdam Port Authority presented the port’s cargo throughput figures for 2017. With a 10.9% y-o-y growth, the Dutch port handled 13.73 million TEU in 2017. The strong results in 2017 reinforced Rotterdam’s position as the largest European container port, followed by Antwerp (10.45 million in 2017, a growth of 4.1%), Hamburg (8.82 million TEU, -1%), Bremerhaven (5.54 million TEU, +0.9%) and Valencia (4.83 Million TEU, +2.3%).

With a 10.9% y-o-y growth, the Dutch port handled 13.73 million TEU in 2017.

With these strong growth figures, you might get the impression that Rotterdam is becoming an increasingly dominant player on the European container port scene. For example, Rotterdam now handles three times more containers than the fifth largest container port in Europe, and almost nine times the container volume of no. 15 in the European port ranking. Another striking observation: Rotterdam’s container volume is higher than the box volume handled by the entire Italian port system.

To evaluate whether we are truly witnessing a growing dominance of Rotterdam (or a ‘Rotterdamisation’ – a term I first coined a few years ago during a discussion with Porteconomics colleagues), the graph shows the long-term evolution (1975-2017) of the share of Rotterdam in the total throughput of the entire European container port system (based on a representative sample of 79 ports), the Le Havre-Hamburg port range (which includes all ports along the coastline between Le Havre in France and Hamburg in Germany), and the Rhine Scheldt delta (i.e. all ports in Belgium and the Netherlands, with Rotterdam, Antwerp and Zeebrugge as the main container ports).

The port of Rotterdam saw a downward trend in its container share between 1975 and 2008,

The port of Rotterdam saw a downward trend in its container share between 1975 and 2008, with a short-lived upsurge in 2004-2005. Rotterdam’s share dropped significantly around the start of the new millennium. In 2008, Rotterdam handled 48.6% of the total container throughput in the Rhine-Scheldt Delta, 26.8% of the volume of the Le Havre-Hamburg range and 12.9% of the total TEU handled in the entire European container port system.

The start of the financial and economic crisis brought an end to the downward trend.

The start of the financial and economic crisis brought an end to the downward trend. After a few years of stagnating shares, the Dutch mainport started to gradually increase its container footprint. The strong 2017 growth figures resulted in an increase of the port’s share to 53.2% of the total container throughput in the Rhine-Scheldt Delta, 31.1% of Le Havre-Hamburg range and 13.9% of the European container port system.

As a leading port, Rotterdam shares the responsibility to support the development of the European container port system towards a more efficient, sustainable, digital and resilient ecosystem.

The dynamics in alliance formation, the changing world economic geography, the realization of Maasvlakte II and the scale effects of the port have all contributed to the recent improvement of Rotterdam’s container throughput position. But at the same time, the European container port scene has become much richer with the rise of Med ports (Piraeus, Sines and Valencia to name but a few) and Baltic ports (such as Gdansk) and with it the multiplication of routing options available to shippers and shipping lines. It is expected that both nearby (Antwerp is only 100km away) and more distant seaports will increasingly challenge Europe’s number one container port. Rotterdam is not only determined to further improve its competitiveness. As a leading port, Rotterdam shares the responsibility to support the development of the European container port system towards a more efficient, sustainable, digital and resilient ecosystem.

Next article Implications of climate change for shipping: ports and supply chains
Previous article Innovative solutions for a sustainable transport network

Theo Notteboom

Dr. Theo Notteboom is co-founder and co-director of PortEconomics. He is a professor in port and maritime economics and management with about 25 years of experience in this area. His work is widely cited. He is a regular speaker at international conferences and a rapporteur/expert to leading organizations in the field. He is Chair Professor at Ghent University in Belgium. He is a visiting Research Professor at China Institute of FTZ Supply Chain of Shanghai Maritime University. He also is part-time Professor at University of Antwerp and the Antwerp Maritime Academy in Belgium. He previously held a full-time position as High-end Foreign Expert / Professor at Dalian Maritime University in China (2014-2016) and an MPA visiting professorship in port management at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. He is immediate past President (2010-2014) and Council Member of International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME). Between October 2006 and October 2014 he was President of ITMMA of the University of Antwerp. Between 2009 and 2014 he was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Belgian Institute of Transport Organizers (BITO), an institute of the Belgian Federal Government.

Related Posts

Geopolitical risks and port-related carbon emissions: evidence and policy implications Category

Geopolitical risks and port-related carbon emissions: evidence and policy implications

Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025 Containers

Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines Containers

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

Weekly Timeline
Oct 5th 7:23 PM
Category

Geopolitical risks and port-related carbon emissions: evidence and policy implications

Oct 2nd 12:27 PM
Thematic Area

Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025

Sep 18th 3:40 PM
Thematic Area

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

Sep 12th 3:48 PM
Thematic Area

Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

Aug 12th 2:18 PM
Thematic Area

Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

Tweets by @PortEconomics
  • Containers
  • Cruise
  • EPP
  • Ports & COVID-19
  • Back to top
About PortEconomics

PortEconomics is a web-based initiative aiming to advance knowledge exchange on seaport studies. Established by maritime economists affiliated to academic institutions in Belgium, Greece and the Netherlands. It provides freely accessible research, education, information, and network-building material on critical issues of port economics, management and policies.

Additional Information
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Edit Profile
  • Contact us
  • PortProfessionals
  • PortReport Series
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
© PortEconomics 2025. All rights reserved.
Produced by PortEconomics
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}