• Home
  • About
    • Members
    • Associate Members
    • Former members
  • Thematic Areas
    • Containers
    • Cruise
    • European Port Policy
    • Ports & COVID-19
  • PortStudies
  • Presentations
  • Noticeboard
  • Viewpoints
  • PortLibrary
  • PortReport
PortEconomics
  • September 25th, 2025
PortEconomics
  • Home
  • About
    • Members
    • Associate Members
    • Former members
  • Thematic Areas
    • Containers
    • Cruise
    • European Port Policy
    • Ports & COVID-19
  • PortStudies
    Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

    Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

    Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents:  Kuwait Shuwaikh Port

    Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents: Kuwait Shuwaikh Port

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    Stakeholders’ attitudes toward container terminal automation

    Stakeholders’ attitudes toward container terminal automation

    Toward green container liner shipping: joint optimization of heterogeneous fleet deployment, speed optimization, and fuel bunkering

    Toward green container liner shipping: joint optimization of heterogeneous fleet deployment, speed optimization, and fuel bunkering

  • Presentations
    Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

    Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

    When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

    When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    The World Ports Tracker in TOC Europe

    The World Ports Tracker in TOC Europe

    Newly-upgraded IAPH World Ports Tracker identifies major sustainability and market trends

    Newly-upgraded IAPH World Ports Tracker identifies major sustainability and market trends

  • Noticeboard
    PhD posts in the area of ports and energy transition

    PhD posts in the area of ports and energy transition

    PortEconomics members among best-performing scholars globally

    PortEconomics members among best-performing scholars globally

    Accessibility or connectivity: why is it correct to say that in the Caribbean the main logistics problem is connectivity?

    Accessibility or connectivity: why is it correct to say that in the Caribbean the main logistics problem is connectivity?

    Cruise Port-City Compass

    Cruise Port-City Compass

    Webinar: short sea shipping services in the southern Caribbean region

    Webinar: short sea shipping services in the southern Caribbean region

  • Viewpoints
    Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

    Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

    In a tight spot: American ports in global supply chains

    In a tight spot: American ports in global supply chains

    Cruise industry in 2025 at a glance

    Cruise industry in 2025 at a glance

    The box that makes the world go around: container terminals and global trade

    The box that makes the world go around: container terminals and global trade

    Antwerp-Bruges surpasses Rotterdam in Q1 2025: a structural shift or short-term fluctuation?

    Antwerp-Bruges surpasses Rotterdam in Q1 2025: a structural shift or short-term fluctuation?

  • PortLibrary
  • PortReport
Antwerp-Bruges surpasses Rotterdam in Q1 2025: a structural shift or short-term fluctuation?Containers

Antwerp-Bruges surpasses Rotterdam in Q1 2025: a structural shift or short-term fluctuation?

April 25th, 2025 Containers, Featured, Thematic Area, Viewpoints

Antwerp-Bruges, Rotterdam 1Q2025

READ ALSO

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines
Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines
Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents:  Kuwait Shuwaikh Port
Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents: Kuwait Shuwaikh Port
Stakeholders’ attitudes toward container terminal automation
Stakeholders’ attitudes toward container terminal automation
Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines
Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

In a remarkable turn of events, the port of Antwerp-Bruges has overtaken Rotterdam in container throughput during the first quarter of 2025. Antwerp-Bruges handled 3.4 million TEU, registering a year-on-year increase of 4.5%, while Rotterdam recorded 3.3 million TEU (+2.2%).

PortEconomics member Theo Notteboom,  reports:

“This development marks the first time since 1966—the year the first container liner services arrived in Europe—that Rotterdam has not held the top spot among European container ports.

Yet, the question remains whether this shift reflects a temporary deviation or a more fundamental reordering of Europe’s port hierarchy. Several structural factors on both the demand and supply sides complicate the picture. Geopolitical tensions have led to unpredictability in global trade lanes, while the recent realignment of shipping alliances—most notably the Gemini Cooperation between Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd—has shifted volumes toward a smaller number of hub ports, with Rotterdam playing a central role.

On the supply side, Rotterdam benefits from ongoing terminal expansion and modernization, particularly at Maasvlakte 2. In contrast, Antwerp-Bruges awaits the long-anticipated implementation of its ECA project, a development that will eventually add more than 7 million TEU in terminal capacity, but not before the end of the decade.

This container volume contest also speaks to the evolving role of performance metrics in port governance. While TEU throughput was once the dominant benchmark for success, port authorities in the Rhine-Scheldt Delta have broadened their focus. Today, sustainability, energy transition, digital innovation, and circular economy integration are gaining traction as key performance indicators alongside traditional cargo volumes.

Still, container handling remains a core activity, and the narrowing TEU gap between the two giants has deep historical roots. Similar shifts occurred in the late 1990s and briefly in 2008. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, Antwerp-Bruges has gradually closed in on Rotterdam’s lead—a dynamic that continues to unfold amid shifting global and regional pressures.

Key Takeaways:

  • Antwerp-Bruges handled 3.4 million TEU in Q1 2025, surpassing Rotterdam’s 3.3 million TEU—the first such occurrence since 1966.
  • Geopolitical disruptions and alliance reshuffling have increased uncertainty and reshaped cargo flows, benefiting hub-focused ports like Rotterdam.
  • Rotterdam is expanding capacity through extensions at Maasvlakte 2 and upgrades at Maasvlakte 1.
  • Antwerp-Bruges awaits its ECA project, which will add over 7 million TEU of terminal capacity by the early 2030s.
  • Port performance metrics are diversifying—sustainability, resilience, and the circular economy are now integral to port strategy.
  • The TEU gap in 2024 was just 0.29 million: Rotterdam handled 13.82 million TEU vs. 13.53 million at Antwerp-Bruges.
  • Shipping alliances play a major role—Gemini favors Rotterdam, but other alliances may balance flows across ports.
  • Automation and infrastructure upgrades continue at Antwerp’s existing terminals, including Antwerp Gateway and Europa Terminal.

 

Next article Container alliance strategies, market concentration and equality: A dynamic time warping clustering approach
Previous article PortReport 7 | East Coast of South America-between aspirations and realities

Related Posts

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines Containers

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey European Port Policy

Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit European Port Policy

Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

Weekly Timeline
Sep 18th 3:40 PM
Thematic Area

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

Sep 12th 3:48 PM
Thematic Area

Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

Aug 12th 2:18 PM
Thematic Area

Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

Jul 21st 11:51 AM
Thematic Area

Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents: Kuwait Shuwaikh Port

Jul 11th 1:40 PM
Category

When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

Tweets by @PortEconomics
  • Containers
  • Cruise
  • EPP
  • Ports & COVID-19
  • Back to top
About PortEconomics

PortEconomics is a web-based initiative aiming to advance knowledge exchange on seaport studies. Established by maritime economists affiliated to academic institutions in Belgium, Greece and the Netherlands. It provides freely accessible research, education, information, and network-building material on critical issues of port economics, management and policies.

Additional Information
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Edit Profile
  • Contact us
  • PortProfessionals
  • PortReport Series
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
© PortEconomics 2025. All rights reserved.
Produced by PortEconomics
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}