• Home
  • About
    • Members
    • Associate Members
    • Former members
  • Thematic Areas
    • Containers
    • Cruise
    • European Port Policy
    • Ports & COVID-19
  • PortStudies
  • Presentations
  • Noticeboard
  • Viewpoints
  • PortLibrary
  • PortReport
PortEconomics
  • September 22nd, 2025
PortEconomics
  • Home
  • About
    • Members
    • Associate Members
    • Former members
  • Thematic Areas
    • Containers
    • Cruise
    • European Port Policy
    • Ports & COVID-19
  • PortStudies
    Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

    Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

    Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents:  Kuwait Shuwaikh Port

    Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents: Kuwait Shuwaikh Port

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    Stakeholders’ attitudes toward container terminal automation

    Stakeholders’ attitudes toward container terminal automation

    Toward green container liner shipping: joint optimization of heterogeneous fleet deployment, speed optimization, and fuel bunkering

    Toward green container liner shipping: joint optimization of heterogeneous fleet deployment, speed optimization, and fuel bunkering

  • Presentations
    Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

    Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

    When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

    When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    Digital technologies for efficient and resilient sea-land logistics

    The World Ports Tracker in TOC Europe

    The World Ports Tracker in TOC Europe

    Newly-upgraded IAPH World Ports Tracker identifies major sustainability and market trends

    Newly-upgraded IAPH World Ports Tracker identifies major sustainability and market trends

  • Noticeboard
    PhD posts in the area of ports and energy transition

    PhD posts in the area of ports and energy transition

    PortEconomics members among best-performing scholars globally

    PortEconomics members among best-performing scholars globally

    Accessibility or connectivity: why is it correct to say that in the Caribbean the main logistics problem is connectivity?

    Accessibility or connectivity: why is it correct to say that in the Caribbean the main logistics problem is connectivity?

    Cruise Port-City Compass

    Cruise Port-City Compass

    Webinar: short sea shipping services in the southern Caribbean region

    Webinar: short sea shipping services in the southern Caribbean region

  • Viewpoints
    Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

    Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

    In a tight spot: American ports in global supply chains

    In a tight spot: American ports in global supply chains

    Cruise industry in 2025 at a glance

    Cruise industry in 2025 at a glance

    The box that makes the world go around: container terminals and global trade

    The box that makes the world go around: container terminals and global trade

    Antwerp-Bruges surpasses Rotterdam in Q1 2025: a structural shift or short-term fluctuation?

    Antwerp-Bruges surpasses Rotterdam in Q1 2025: a structural shift or short-term fluctuation?

  • PortLibrary
  • PortReport
How significant is the slowdown in chinese container ports?Containers

How significant is the slowdown in chinese container ports?

December 4th, 2015 Containers, Featured, Noticeboard

READ ALSO

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines
Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

0548677e6432786dd8df61eb3aaec139_XSBy Theo Notteboom

Chinese container ports are feeling the full impact of the Chinese economic slowdown and the weak global economic situation. Over the years, we have become used to seeing high growth rates in Chinese ports, so the sudden change might come as a bit of surprise to many. How significant is the slowdown in container throughput in Chinese gateways and how do the figures compare to the situation in other key container port regions around the world?

The infographic shows the year-on-year growth in container throughput in the three main container port regions in China (i.e. Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta and the Bohai Rim). Two key trading partners of China are also included: the port system along the North American West Coast including ports such as Seattle/Tacoma, Vancouver, LA, Long Beach and Oakland; and the Hamburg-Le Havre port range consisting of key north-European container ports such as Rotterdam, Antwerp, Hamburg, Bremerhaven, Le Havre, Zeebrugge and Wilhelmshaven. We conclude the following.

First, the Pearl River Delta (Hong Kong, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and many others) shows a much lower growth rate than the two other Chinese port regions. Since 2004, its growth pattern is very similar to the one observed in the Hamburg-Le Havre range. Actually, after the financial crisis year 2009 year-on-year growth in the Pearl River Delta is even slightly weaker than in the considered European and North American port systems. In particular, the traffic position of Hong Kong is getting weaker since 2009 with a further decline of 8.7% in the first ten months of 2015. The port is expected to handle about 20 million TEU in 2015, compared to 24.24 million TEU in record year 2008. Even Shenzhen is witnessing a much lower volume increase this year with only +2% up to October 2015.

Second, the Yangtze River Delta recorded elevated annual growth rates of 15 to 40% before the economic crisis. Since 2011, container volumes increase by a much more modest 4 to 7% per annum. The first ten months of 2015 show a growth of ‘only’ 4.5% with Shanghai +3.3%, Ningbo +6.9% and higher growth rates for river ports Nanjing and Suzhou.

Third, the Bohai Bay region is considered as one of the fastest rising container regions in the world. However, its growth pattern shows a sudden and strong downward trend since 2013. In the first ten months of 2015 container traffic even stagnated at +0.2% with Tianjin (-2.8%; partly because of the blast earlier this year) and Dalian (-2.1%) showing the weakest figures. With this result, the (former) rising star of the Chinese container port system is positioning itself among more mature port regions such as the Pearl River Delta and the Hamburg-Le Havre range (-1% mainly caused by traffic decline in Zeebrugge, Hamburg and Bremerhaven). The North American West Coast recorded +2.5% in the same period thanks to the 5 to 6% growth figures in Seattle/Tacoma, Vancouver and Long Beach and a strong growth in Prince Rupert, which overcompensated the traffic decline in Los Angeles and Oakland.

Fourth, the relationship between GDP growth and container growth in China is changing. For a very long time, the GDP multiplier was well above one, meaning that any increase in the GDP coincided with a much higher container throughput growth. In the past five years, the GDP multiplier is consistently below one for most of the port regions in China. This supports the notion that the Chinese economy is going through a transition phase with more focus on the services sector and a growing dependency on domestic demand instead of external trade.

Overall, 2015 promises to become a weak year in the container port industry. Contrary to the temporary slowdowns observed during the Southeast Asian crisis (1997-1998), the Dotcom crisis (2001) and even the financial crisis (late 2008-2009), the volume slowdown of the past five years is visible in all port regions considered and seems to be of a more structural nature. Obviously, not all ports face the same situation. In a fairly stagnant market, you can only grow by taking volumes from your rivals. This leaves room for port users to play off one port against the other. The resulting intensified port competition is leading to stronger growth differences between adjacent ports, as can be observed in port regions in Europe, the US and China. No wonder that port cooperation has become such a hot topic, also in China.

Next article The competitive position of the upgraded Panama canal
Previous article Institutions, transport infrastructure governance, and planning: Lessons from the corporatization of port authorities in East Asia

Theo Notteboom

Dr. Theo Notteboom is co-founder and co-director of PortEconomics. He is a professor in port and maritime economics and management with about 25 years of experience in this area. His work is widely cited. He is a regular speaker at international conferences and a rapporteur/expert to leading organizations in the field. He is Chair Professor at Ghent University in Belgium. He is a visiting Research Professor at China Institute of FTZ Supply Chain of Shanghai Maritime University. He also is part-time Professor at University of Antwerp and the Antwerp Maritime Academy in Belgium. He previously held a full-time position as High-end Foreign Expert / Professor at Dalian Maritime University in China (2014-2016) and an MPA visiting professorship in port management at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. He is immediate past President (2010-2014) and Council Member of International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME). Between October 2006 and October 2014 he was President of ITMMA of the University of Antwerp. Between 2009 and 2014 he was Chairman of the Board of Directors of Belgian Institute of Transport Organizers (BITO), an institute of the Belgian Federal Government.

Related Posts

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines Containers

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey European Port Policy

Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit European Port Policy

Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

Weekly Timeline
Sep 18th 3:40 PM
Thematic Area

Portgraphic: fleet capacity (owned/chartered) of container shipping lines

Sep 12th 3:48 PM
Thematic Area

Investments and financing challenges of the EU’s port managing bodies; findings from a comprehensive survey

Aug 12th 2:18 PM
Thematic Area

Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

Jul 21st 11:51 AM
Thematic Area

Evaluating customer satisfaction with clearing and forwarding agents: Kuwait Shuwaikh Port

Jul 11th 1:40 PM
Category

When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

Tweets by @PortEconomics
  • Containers
  • Cruise
  • EPP
  • Ports & COVID-19
  • Back to top
About PortEconomics

PortEconomics is a web-based initiative aiming to advance knowledge exchange on seaport studies. Established by maritime economists affiliated to academic institutions in Belgium, Greece and the Netherlands. It provides freely accessible research, education, information, and network-building material on critical issues of port economics, management and policies.

Additional Information
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Edit Profile
  • Contact us
  • PortProfessionals
  • PortReport Series
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
© PortEconomics 2025. All rights reserved.
Produced by PortEconomics
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}