• Home
  • About
    • Members
    • Associate Members
    • Former members
  • Thematic Areas
    • Containers
    • Cruise
    • European Port Policy
    • Ports & COVID-19
  • PortStudies
  • Presentations
  • Noticeboard
  • Viewpoints
  • PortLibrary
  • PortReport
PortEconomics
  • April 23rd, 2026
PortEconomics
  • Home
  • About
    • Members
    • Associate Members
    • Former members
  • Thematic Areas
    • Containers
    • Cruise
    • European Port Policy
    • Ports & COVID-19
  • PortStudies
    Risk-driven supply chain designs – a re-assessment with geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations

    Risk-driven supply chain designs – a re-assessment with geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations

    Rhine-Scheldt delta port system

    Rhine-Scheldt delta port system

    A metric of global maritime supply chain disruptions: The global supply chain stress index - maritime (GSCSI-M)

    A metric of global maritime supply chain disruptions: The global supply chain stress index - maritime (GSCSI-M)

    ESG disclosure as a proxy of port corporate communication and sustainable management strategy: An LDA approach

    ESG disclosure as a proxy of port corporate communication and sustainable management strategy: An LDA approach

    From coal exports to green steel production? The role of circular economy precincts for sustainable port diversification

    From coal exports to green steel production? The role of circular economy precincts for sustainable port diversification

  • Presentations
    IAPH World Ports Tracker 2026 reveals state of global port sustainability

    IAPH World Ports Tracker 2026 reveals state of global port sustainability

    PortGraphic: Container port dynamics near Gibraltar

    PortGraphic: Container port dynamics near Gibraltar

    Top-10 PortReads in 2025

    Top-10 PortReads in 2025

    Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

    Port reform: World Bank publishes the third edition of its port reform toolkit

    When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

    When will we admit that maritime transport will not be decarbonised by 2050?

  • Noticeboard
    Call for papers: Contemporary Maritime Economics: Transformations and Emerging Perspectives

    Call for papers: Contemporary Maritime Economics: Transformations and Emerging Perspectives

    ECONSHIP2026: Call for papers

    ECONSHIP2026: Call for papers

    Call for papers: 1st Florence Maritime Regulation Conference

    Call for papers: 1st Florence Maritime Regulation Conference

    PortEconomics co-director appointed Senior Scientific Advisor to the Florence School of Regulation

    PortEconomics co-director appointed Senior Scientific Advisor to the Florence School of Regulation

    Jean Monnet Chair in European Port Policy

    Jean Monnet Chair in European Port Policy

  • Viewpoints
    Port-city integration

    Port-city integration

    Commission unveils new EU Ports Strategy

    Commission unveils new EU Ports Strategy

    PortGraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in Q3 2025

    PortGraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in Q3 2025

    Maritime transport in net zero

    Maritime transport in net zero

    Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025

    Portgraphic: Top-15 EU container ports in H1 2025

  • PortLibrary
  • PortReport
IAPH World Ports Tracker 2026 reveals state of global port sustainabilityFeatured

IAPH World Ports Tracker 2026 reveals state of global port sustainability

April 23rd, 2026 Featured, Presentations

READ ALSO

Newly-upgraded IAPH World Ports Tracker identifies major sustainability and market trends
Newly-upgraded IAPH World Ports Tracker identifies major sustainability and market trends
IAPH World Ports Tracker H2 2023: no investment delays and over a third of respondents will invest in non-fossil fuel energy production
IAPH World Ports Tracker H2 2023: no investment delays and over a third of respondents will invest in non-fossil fuel energy production
IAPH World Ports Tracker Q2 2023: more port calls with less cargo, truck driver shortages appear; overall liner trade connectivity improves
IAPH World Ports Tracker Q2 2023: more port calls with less cargo, truck driver shortages appear; overall liner trade connectivity improves
Risk-driven supply chain designs – a re-assessment with geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations
Risk-driven supply chain designs – a re-assessment with geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations

​Feedback from global ports handling more than 8.6 billion tons of maritime cargo gives a clear picture of a sector committed to steady sustainability attainment but wary of growing security threats

​Despite regulatory uncertainty and political headwinds, decarbonisation plans by the world’s leading ports do not appear materially changed in 2026, IAPH’s World Ports Tracker 2026 reveals. The status of IMO’s Net Zero Framework has been in doubt since October last year, yet more than half of world ports are ‘going the extra mile’ by publicly declaring targets to achieve carbon neutrality before 2050. Meanwhile, ports are making steady inroads toward infrastructure for bunkering low and zero-carbon marine fuels, with LNG operational in a third of ports.

​The survey results of IAPH’s most-engaged ports have been analysed in the latest version of the IAPH World Ports Tracker 2026 – Sustainability and Market Trends, written by Professors Theo Notteboom and Thanos Pallis – PortEconomics co-directors- of the IAPH Risk and Resilience technical committee. This work builds on the comprehensive upgrade of the World Ports Tracker undertaken in 2025, allowing insightful comparative analysis between the two editions.

Together, the responding ports from IAPH’s membership handle more than 8.6 billion tons of maritime cargo and 372 million TEU. They were questioned on the six areas of interest of the World Ports Sustainability Program (WPSP) and on their views on market prospects. The report further gathers additional data on container port productivity and liner connectivity from UNCTAD/MDS and S&P Global.

The IAPH World Ports Tracker 2026 is available exclusively to IAPH members via the IAPH website. Non-members can access a paid edition of the report.

IAPH Managing Director Patrick Verhoeven commented: “Thanks to the generous time commitment and thoughtful input of IAPH’s regular members, in the IAPH World Ports Tracker 2026 we have the clearest picture yet of sustainability in the global port industry. Moreover, the results vindicate the approach of IAPH’s technical committees and working groups, which are focused on exchanging knowledge and providing cutting-edge resources to the industry – this includes moves to strengthen cybersecurity and climate resilience, remove barriers to onshore power and zero-carbon fuels adoption, and provide pathways to port certification via the Environmental Ship Index and our pilot project for Sustainable Cruise Port Accreditation.”

The most notable findings in this year’s edition of the IAPH World Ports Tracker were as follows:

  • 53% of ports worldwide appear to be taking proactive steps to support the IMO’s GHG decarbonisation deadline, having publicly announced commitments to reach carbon neutrality ahead of the 2050 deadline.
  • Cybersecurity threats are the most important risk factor perceived by port authorities, with 61% of respondents classifying cyberattacks as a high risk, ahead of natural disasters and climate change. An increasing number of ports (85%) integrate cybersecurity considerations into the implementation of emerging technologies.
  • The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) in ports has seen a clear increase; meanwhile, more than half of the ports now report using automation, robotics and drones.
  • Renewable electricity produced onsite in port areas relies heavily on solar power – three quarters of ports report solar energy production.
  • In terms of implementing rules and procedures for the safe bunkering of low- and zero-carbon marine fuels, LNG (operational in 33% of ports) and biofuels (24%) show the most significant progress to date; ammonia and hydrogen remain in the early stages of adoption.
  • The uneven pace of onshore power (OPS) adoption is evident in disparate results that show 29% deployment for harbour craft and port auxiliary vessels, 19% for container vessels, 14% for cruise ships and 11% for ferries. Technical challenges and a lower frequency of OPS‑ready vessels has limited uptake for bulk carriers and tankers.
  • ​ISO 14001 is the dominant Environmental Management System in the port sector, with 42% of port authorities obtaining certification, but a substantial share of ports have yet to formalize their environmental governance through a recognized certification scheme.
  • An increasing number of surveyed ports (67%) report investing in ecological restoration as part of their environmental policy and responsibility, with more than half investing in ecological restoration as part of development projects.
  • Seven out of ten ports are facilitating systematic consultation with community stakeholders as a key part of their decision-making processes.
  • 58% of ports anticipate an increase in cruise passenger traffic – a figure that has more than doubled compared to 2025. Strong growth expectations prevail, with 16% of ports forecasting increases of more than 10%.
  • The majority of projects across all port investment categories were executed as planned last year, although new energy and fuel infrastructure projects appear to face greater implementation challenges
  • Market analysis of the trends for container flows points towards significant growth in the Southern hemisphere, especially in developing markets in South East Asia and Latin America, compared to stagnation or a slight decline in volumes in developed regions such as Northern Europe and North America.
  • The Liner Shipping Connectivity Index (LSCI) increased in seven of the 10 best-connected locations, with connectivity gains skewed toward selected Asian growth nodes; China remained the clear global leader. India (9th), recorded the strongest gains (+11.9%) of all well-connected countries in 2025.

​Professor Theo Notteboom and PortEconomics co-director commented: “It’s very interesting to look at geopolitical tensions and the role they play in the risk management of ports. 26% of respondents viewed geopolitical instability as a high risk factor, with another 48% tagging it as a medium risk – those figures are not the highest among all the possible risk factors, but we saw an important increase of the risk perception if you compare 2025 and 2026 results. This factor is growing in importance. The collection of responses concluded at the end of February 2026 – before the outbreak of the conflict in the Middle East – so those conclusions need to be put in perspective.”

Professor Thanos Pallis commented: “In this year’s IAPH World Ports Tracker, a cautious optimism was recorded across all market segments: ports anticipated positive developments over the next 12 months – moderate compared to the previous year but remaining positive. The data collection concluded at the end of February before the conflict in the Middle East developed, yet it’s instructive to compare with the port predictions made at the beginning of 2025: even though there was instability in maritime trade in 2025 due to different trade policies – especially conflicts regarding tariffs – the evolution of trade did not defer from the initial port industry forecast.”

​You can download a summary presentation of the IAPH World Ports Tracker 2026 – Sustainability and Market Trends report here and watch an accompanying video presentation of the results by the authors here.

First published here.

Previous article Risk-driven supply chain designs – a re-assessment with geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations

Related Posts

Risk-driven supply chain designs – a re-assessment with geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations Featured

Risk-driven supply chain designs – a re-assessment with geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations

Port-city integration European Port Policy

Port-city integration

Rhine-Scheldt delta port system Featured

Rhine-Scheldt delta port system

Weekly Timeline
Apr 23rd 4:58 PM
Featured

IAPH World Ports Tracker 2026 reveals state of global port sustainability

Apr 8th 1:36 PM
Featured

Risk-driven supply chain designs – a re-assessment with geopolitical and geoeconomic considerations

Mar 27th 5:31 PM
Thematic Area

Port-city integration

Mar 9th 4:35 PM
Featured

Rhine-Scheldt delta port system

Mar 6th 1:23 PM
Thematic Area

Commission unveils new EU Ports Strategy

Tweets by @PortEconomics
  • Containers
  • Cruise
  • EPP
  • Ports & COVID-19
  • Back to top
About PortEconomics

PortEconomics is a web-based initiative aiming to advance knowledge exchange on seaport studies. Established by maritime economists affiliated to academic institutions in Belgium, Greece and the Netherlands. It provides freely accessible research, education, information, and network-building material on critical issues of port economics, management and policies.

Additional Information
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Edit Profile
  • Contact us
  • PortProfessionals
  • PortReport Series
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
© PortEconomics 2025. All rights reserved.
Produced by PortEconomics
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}